atp’s posterous

assemblée des troubadours phynanciers 

james @gk: a v-shaped recovery in profits

 

---voici un peu d'herbe pour nos bulls. après avoir renié, il y a 12 mois, toute possibilité de récession aux US, les voici en train de fanfaronner une v-shaped recovery. mais ne rions pas trop fort, ils finiront bien par avoir raison un jour… http://gavekal.com/index.cfm ---

 

In many ways, the current recovery seems to be following the dull pattern of previous economic rebounds. First, we were told that the fiscal and monetary stimulus would, this time around, not gain any traction. Then, as ‘green shoots’ began sprouting into a jungle, we were told that the economic recovery is simply an “inventory-led” rebound. Logically, this means that the next step from here on out should be declarations that the recovery is a “profitless recovery”. Following that, and as profits emerge, we will likely be told that the recovery is “jobless”. In turn, the recovery will be “unsustainable”… until, of course, books are written (maybe by us?) about how we are living a “new paradigm”...

Based on previous patterns, we should soon be entering the phase of the cycle whereby investors ponder how “profitless” the recovery really is? Of course, for investors, the question of profits is always critical. After all, corporate profits are one of the two main determinants of stock market performance (the other being the cost of money). And in a period when most investors are still overweight cash, corporate profits are all the more important since they can give investors the courage to deploy capital in risk assets.

Interestingly, looking through our series of indicators, we find that there are a number of reasons to believe that corporate profits could surprise on the upside.

Comments [0]

loo @atp: CIT systemically important?

---quand je lis ca j'ai lu ça, je me suis dit "Government Sachs ne sauve pas n'importe qui, uniquement les contreparties de GS, bye bye CIT ". http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=av0oK2D8zQgg ---

Fitch Ratings has warned that CIT may default as soon as April 2010 when a US$2.1 billion credit line matures. CIT applied to access the FDIC's bond guarantee program in order to access debt markets but as of July 13 the FDIC hadn't given their consent due to credit risk concerns. CIT is a small business lender and it argues that its demise would be disruptive for the real economy. Timothy Geithner said that Treasury has the authority and the ability to intervene if it chooses to do so.

---et puis j'ai lu ça, et j'ai revu mon jugement: "bien joué CIT, tu es définitivement ce que Government Sachs appelle systemically important". http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2009/07/14/61751/us-in-talks-to-rescu ---

The crisis at CIT, one of the largest US middle-market lenders, worsened on Monday with the company talking to regulators about ways to stave off failure while its credit ratings were cut deeper into junk territory A failure at CIT could result in losses for Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo, the FT said. Goldman last year agreed to a $3bn secured financing facility for CIT and Wells Fargo provided $500m in secured financing. The WSJ said US government officials were in advanced talks about providing some sort of aid to the company, but it added the discussions are fluid and that it remained unclear whether a final deal could be brokered.

Comments [0]

john @bc: coke cartons is part of the tribal peace offering

 

--- ça nous remet bien les pieds sur terre. j'imagine que c'est bien de coca-cola dont le journaleux parle ;) http://brontecapital.blogspot.com/2009/06/ubiquity-of-coca-cola.html ---

I was perusing the Post-Courier Online - a newspaper in Papua New Guinea. The cover story with picture is as follows:

 

 

Neighbouring tribes in South Wahgi district of Western Highlands Province exchanged food at the weekend as they started negotiation to restore peace among themselves and end hostilities in their area. The Ngenika and Kisu tribes have realised that there was an increase in illegal activities in their communities and after much discussion, starting in 2007, the Kisu tribe gave 21 cows, red pandanus fruits (marita), 200 coke cartons, scone packets, sugarcane and bananas to the Ngenika tribe. They also slaughtered 100 pigs for their neighbours. Last year the Ngenika tribe gave 10 cows with the same amount of food to the Kisu.

 

200 Coke Cartons is part of the tribal peace offering between tribes in the Western Highlands of PNG. And you read about it on the internet.

 

This modern world is very strange.

 

Comments [0]

thesing @bb: ecb lends record 442b

 

---l'ami j-c a bel et bien fini par passer sa licence de canader! http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZhZvQc0E_Eg ---

The European Central Bank said it will lend banks 442 billion euros ($621 billion) for 12 months, the most it has ever allotted in an auction, as it steps up efforts to unblock credit markets in the 16-nation euro region.

The Frankfurt-based ECB filled all bids in its first offer of 12-month loans to banks at the current benchmark interest rate of 1 percent. The 1,121 banks that participated receive the funds tomorrow. The euro interbank offered rate, or Euribor, for 12-month loans fell to 1.57 percent today, a record low.

“It’s even more than our most optimistic scenario would have suggested,” said Christoph Rieger, a fixed income strategist at Commerzbank AG in Frankfurt. “There is so much liquidity around that it will push money-market rates to new record lows.”

The ECB, battling Europe’s worst recession since World War II, is concentrating its efforts on lubricating the banking system, which accounts for about three quarters of company financing in the region. The central bank has cut interest rates to the lowest on record and will next month start buying 60 billion euros of covered bonds to help free up credit.

[…]

 Today’s is the first of three auctions planned for this year, with the others to be held on Sept. 29 and Dec. 15.

[…]

“While the ECB’s liquidity support to euro-zone banks sounds the right thing to do, as bank lending is by far the most important source of financing for euro-zone non-financial firms, there is no guarantee that banks will use this extra liquidity to lend to the broader economy,” said Daniele Antonucci, an economist at Capital Economics Ltd. in London.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said today the ECB should quickly cut interest rates toward zero and commit to keeping them there for as long as needed to revive the economy.

While President Jean-Claude Trichet has not closed the door to further reductions, Germany’s Axel Weber said yesterday the bank has used up its room for rate cuts and Austria’s Ewald Nowotny said in a June 19 interview that borrowing costs are likely to remain at their current level into 2010.

“If financial institutions judge that interest rates are now likely to have troughed in the euro area, this operation represents possibly the final opportunity to obtain 12-month funding at just 1 percent,” said Colin Ellis, an economist at Daiwa Securities SMBC Europe Ltd. in London.

Weber said yesterday he expects the 12-month loans to “lead to a further narrowing of spreads” on longer-term market interest rates. Demand for shorter-term ECB loans may wane as a result of the new auction, he said.

 

Comments [0]

kaminska @ft: libor is useless

--- useless? je dirais plutôt un trop beau trade qui n'a plus gros jus J http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2009/06/22/58316/libor-is-useless/ ---

Much has been made of Libor’s recent descent to post-Lehman crisis lows. But while some say it marks the return of a healthy interbank lending market, others — rising in number by the way– appear to see it as evidence of Libor’s growing irrelevance.

Chief among the “Libor is useless ” brigade is Zerohedge blogger Tyler Durden. He writes in a recent post:
…in true pro-cyclical fashion, the expectation for permanent governmental crutches can be best seen in some of the same metrics that in the post-Lehman days markedly went off the charts, most notably the LIBOR rate. From record wides several months ago, LIBOR, which is critical as it is the reference risk rate for trillions in assorted product classes, has collapsed to an unprecedented low. The rate drop has manifested in an inversion of the 1 Yr UST - 1 Yr LIBOR spread, with the latter clearing 100 bps inside of the former: a topic covered in detail previously by reader Gary Jefferey.

He further points us to news that the British Bankers’ Association (BBA), which sets the daily rate, is looking to expand the list of banks contributing quotes to the daily fixing due to the mergerfication of its 16-standing members.  As the WSJ notes:

Currently there is no good alternative to LIBOR, although the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) is trying to replace it with limited success. So, the marketplace is searching for an alternative with many banks attempting to devise their own measures to varying degrees of success.

They go on:
World central banks have used the Term Auction Facility (or TAF) in a heavy-handed way to suppress LIBOR. They are doing this because virtually all subprime adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) are reset using LIBOR. In other words, world central banks are subsidizing shaky mortgages by artificially lowering the reference rate used to reset rates every year. The problem is banks are not happy with the effect this has on other lending and are looking for alternatives. So in a nutshell, yes,  central banks have successfully driven down Libor rates  thanks to the Fed’s TAF facility. This is good because most subprime adjustable rates are linked to Libor. Great joy. However, as far as encouraging banks to lend again, that might be an entirely different story.

Banks are seeking out alternatives to low Libor rate because they’re clearly still unconvinced by talk of an imminent recovery. They still want to protect new lending with deals linked to alternative rates, more reflective in their minds of the premium needed to cover their risk exposure.

The BBA’s move, meanwhile, is a case of adapt or die. The manoeuvre clearly hopes to prove Libor is still relevant to the market, but actually shows off more concerns about its use as a floating-rate benchmark in the future than anything else.

Comments [1]

hughes+jenkins @ft: switzerland looks at cutting size of banks

--- "no more taboos", j'ai bien lu? on parle bien de banques suisses? de la bns qui plus est? on doit pas parler de la même suisse! http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/90c7015a-5c01-11de-aea3-00144feabdc0.html ---

Switzerland upped the ante in a global regulatory assault on the banking industry on Thursday as its central bank warned that Zurich was examining the forced shrinkage of banking groups such as UBS and Credit Suisse to contain the risks posed by their size.

The central bank is looking at imposing constraints on the size of its biggest domestic banks unless global policymakers can come up with a new system to deal with large banks when they fail.

Philipp Hildebrand, vice-chairman of the Swiss National Bank, said: “There can be no more taboos, given our experiences of the last two years.”

“There are advantages to size . . . [but] in the case of the large international banks, the empirical evidence would seem to suggest that these institutions have long exceeded the size needed to make full use of these advantages,” Mr Hildebrand said as the central bank unveiled its stability report.

UBS and Credit Suisse prompted alarm among authorities about the risks their size posed to the Swiss economy when they reported heavy losses as a result of the financial crisis. Last year, their collective assets were equivalent to six times Swiss GDP.

The central bank envisaged “direct and indirect measures to limit [large banks’] size,” said Mr Hildebrand.

His comments on Thursday caused unease among Swiss banks, which said that the SNB did not have direct responsibility over banking regulation and therefore lacked powers to implement any such controls.

“This is strong language,” said one bank executive. “But the SNB doesn’t have a direct say in the regulation of the banks.” Another said Mr Hildebrand’s comments were “little more than sabre-rattling”.

However, the remarks will be scrutinised by policymakers and investors on both sides of the Atlantic. They come as central bankers and regulators around the world are ratcheting up language on banking reform.

Mr Hildebrand called for regulators to work together to develop an international process for the orderly wind-down of a broken bank. But he warned that, if that process could not be designed in a “reasonable” time frame, then more direct measures should be examined.

[…]

Comments [0]

hedge fund manager @ml: where is the confidence coming from?

--- allons, ne crachons pas sur une bonne petite dose de miel après toutes cette herbe ruminée depuis la mi-mars… ---

 

The ability of the market to shrug off bad news and ignore it or even take encouragement from it is truly remarkable. Rampant bullishness in the midst of the worst recession in 75 years.

 

A sampling of the way strategists and analysts are receiving the bad news: 

 

Weak employment? Lagging indicator.

Deflation? Will not be a problem for long.

Bonds collapsing? Sign of growth to come!

Exploding delinquencies? Fewer left to become delinquent!

Numbers revised lower for last month? Means the uptrend is better!

Housing starts shrinking? Less supply, good for house prices.

House prices still falling? The lower they are the less they can fall further.

European banks 750BN of losses unrecognized? Not the problem anymore!

Data is bad? Confidence is good!

 

Where is this confidence coming from? Apparently humans do not like to be depressed for very long after losing half their wealth. Look - a greenshoot here and a tulip there! When the greenshoots were undeniably exposed as weeds, a strategy report read: Brownshoots are enough.

 

This has striking similarity to Nasdaq 98-99. Buy because momentum is strong, there is a wall of money on the sidelines that has to buy, no one is long, cash levels are high, everyone will have to chase into month end, everyone will have to chase into quarter end, everyone will have to chase into year end. And by the way - be ready to jump off the train first in case it starts going the other way.

 

Here is a gem from an unnamed bank: The main driver for a further rally globally will be the continuing need for professional fund managers to increase beta given the continuing reality that the vast majority of long-only and long-short managers have substantially underperformed equity indices so far this year.

 

You do not hear much about cheap valuation anymore with the S&P P/E ratio of 15, and analysts earning expectations for 2010 vastly optimistic.

 

You also hear that a lot of hedge funds are not on board. While that may be true in the skeptical macro community, this group is small in number and size relative to hedge funds in general. Hedge funds on whole had the best month in 9 years in April, followed by a strong result again in May. The S&P was up 9.4% and 5.3% respectively. The community is certainly on board.

 

[...]

 

Past bear market rallies went 50% and even 100%. Coming back to the Nasdaq bubble. It was widely thought to be overvalued at 1500 in mid 1998. It rallied for another 21 months and over 200% before the wheels fell off at 4800. If this equity rally is a QE driven bubble of its own, with newly printed money somehow seeping into the equity markets since no one wants bonds or property and businesses are not borrowing to invest, then one has to be very careful trying to stand in its way.

 

 

 

Comments [0]

barnes @gk: functioning societies are either built on guilt or on shame

--- chez gavekal ils aiment bien polariser et catégoriser. à mon avis pas toujours très pertinent, mais toujours ca pousse à la réflexion! http://gavekal.com ---

[…]

One of our core beliefs is that functioning societies are either built on guilt (Judeo-Christian societies) or on shame (Asia). Societies based on shame have a lot of advantages (low crime rates, strong social cohesion…) but one massive disadvantage: they lack a mechanism to deal with failure (except suicide). In the US, if you run an auto company into the ground, you declare bankruptcy, ask for forgiveness and move on. Meanwhile, in Japan, admitting failure is akin to political suicide. This implies that things have to get a lot worse before they get better... In fact, things have to go to a level where failure becomes collective rather than individual.?Only then can failure be addressed. This is what happened with the Asian Crisis of 1997-98

[…]

Comments [0]

cavallo+cottani @voxeu: a simpler way to solve the dollar problem

 

--- à mon avis les ricains n' accepteront jms de faire une croix sur l'option de pouvoir inflate their debt away, mais la suggestion reste intéressante. toutefois pas certain d avoir saisi toutes les implications qu elle aurait sur le FX et et le global trade and payment system. http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3551 ---

When China’s Premier Wen Jiabao recently expressed concerns about the future of the US dollar, the currency in which most of his country’s official reserves are denominated, his remarks provoked contrasting reactions among US economists.

[…]

The problem with this “solution,” aside from the reputational problems it creates for the US government, is that once the inflation genie is out of the bottle, it will be very difficult to put it back in. As for the solution proposed by the Chinese central bank and Mr. Bergsten, there are, unfortunately, several problems. First, the plan requires a complex multilateral negotiation, including a change in the IMF’s Articles of Agreements, which is unlikely to be supported by the US, if anything because the SDR will compete with the dollar as a reserve currency unit. Second, the proposal restricts the menu of potential dollar substitutes to the SDR, itself a basket of currencies with a predominant dollar share. Third, a substitution account in the IMF makes the IMF rather than the US government liable for losses resulting from the depreciation of the dollar vis-à-vis the SDR, a condition likely to be opposed by other Fund members.

However, the most important drawback of the China/Bergsten proposal is that it does not really protect US official creditors from a persistent fall in the dollar. This is because in the event of a protracted dollar depreciation, it is highly unlikely that the central banks of Europe, Japan, and the UK will stay put and let their currencies appreciate. More likely, these countries will resist appreciation by engaging in a process of competitive devaluations, the end result of which will be an increase in global inflation. If so, the reserves of China and other emerging makets will lose real value whether they are in dollars or SDRs. More importantly, inflation will be high everywhere in the world, and it will take years of high real interest rates and low growth to bring it down.

Fortunately, there is an easier and better way to protect the value of emerging market reserves while reducing the risk of a resurgence in world inflation. This is to reduce the incentive of the US government to “inflate its way out of debt.” For this to happen, all US creditors need to do is demand that the US government swap nominal US Treasury bills, notes, and bonds for inflation-adjusted instruments (TIPS) on demand. Since, at present, the supply of TIPS is very small in relation to the rest of the US national debt, bilateral coordination would be necessary to avoid distorting their value.

One of the advantages of this idea is its simplicity. For starters, it can be executed bilaterally rather than multilaterally. This not only makes it easy to implement, but also gives the US government leverage to extract concessions from the other governments. For example, in the case of China, it would be possible for the US to negotiate a quid-pro-quo, whereby China commits to reforms geared to reducing its structural current account surplus—including, but not limited to, a more flexible exchange rate policy. For this reason, it would be preferable that the swap proposal comes from the US rather than from its creditors.

But, more important than the practical advantages are the beneficial long term effects of such a policy, particularly in averting the specter of global inflation. By substituting TIPS for nominal bonds, the US government would be sending a strong signal that it does not plan to “inflate its way out of debt,” as disingenuously suggested by Mr. Rogoff but, to the contrary, will commit itself to adopting a more disciplined monetary and fiscal policy going forward.

Comments [1]

saluzzi @bb:orchestrated financial massive short squeeze

Comments [0]